 |
 |
|
08.10.09 Listening To Customers Without Acting Is Worthless  By Michael BritoWikipedia tells us that active listening is an intent to "listen for meaning". Others suggest that active listening should "focus on who you are listening to, whether in a group or one-on-one, in order to understand what he or she is saying." These are excellent definitions. But as it relates to customer interactions on the social web, active listening is only one half of the equation. Take for example, this brief illustration. A man gets home from work and starts engaging in a meaningful discussion with his wife about his bad habits (or rather, she engages with him). She insists that she is tired of picking up his dirty socks from the living room floor; and asks him to be more mindful of picking up after himself. He actively listens to her, agrees; but forgets to put his dirty socks in the hamper that evening. What happens next might sound familiar - lather, rinse, repeat; or in other words, active listening with no action for the simplest of requests. The end result is an unhealthy relationship in some cases. A lot of organizations today do an excellent job at listening to their customers online. In fact, some very well respected companies and technologies have emerged that address this new trend of listening on the social web (BuzzGain, Radian 6, Visible Technologies). Many of these tools have great reporting functionality; and some even help create feedback workflows for brands. But the work doesn't stop there. The question for brand marketers (and I am talking to myself as well) is ... "how long can we expect our customers to continue talking to us if all we do is just listen?" Given the example above, there is much more than just listening. A recent report by Charlene Li and Wetpiant might shed some light on this very subject. The report looked at several brands and measured their breadth and depth of engagement with consumers on the social web. Here are the top ten brands with their scores: 1. Starbucks (127) 2. Dell (123) 3. eBay (115) 4. Google (105)
5. Microsoft (103) 6. Thomson Reuters (101) 7. Nike (100) 8. Amazon (88) 9. SAP (86) 10. Tie - Yahoo!/Intel (85) What makes this report even more interesting is the correlation of engagement and financial performance. The analysis groups each brand with the greatest depth and breadth into a category titled "Social Media Mavens". On average, those who were classified as "Social Media Mavens" grew 18% in revenue over the last 12 months. On the other hand, the companies who were least engaged with consumers on the social web unfortunately suffered an average of 6% decline in revenue. Here is the actual report (PDF) for reference. A closer examination of the top two companies' social initiatives leads to an intuitive revelation. Continue reading this article.
|
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
-- EnterpriseCustomer
is an iEntry,
Inc. publication -- |
